SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
HALEEMA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent
Civil Revision Petition | O.P.(Ele) No. 214 of 2008



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.RENY ANTO
For the Respondents: SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SMT.S.L.SYLAJA GP

The court emphasizes re-evaluation of compensation for land use under infrastructure laws considering all evidence, ensuring fair justice.

Headnote:The Civil Revision Petition was filed against the order dated 03.10.2017, where compensation was awarded under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and Indian Electricity Act, 1910 for trees cut for an electric line. The court found the land value as Rs. 15,000/- per cent to be questionable. Court remanded the matter for reconsideration, asking the District Judge to reassess the evidence and contentions. The relevant sections invoked in this case framed the dispute around lawful compensation for property use under infrastructural development laws. | The primary issues revolved around the land valuation and the assessment of diminution in property value due to the electric line. The court emphasized the need to review all relevant evidence presented, noting previous land sale in similar conditions. | The petition was successful in its objective to have the initial decision re-evaluated.

Table of Content
1. compensation determination and property value assessment. (Para 2 , 3)
2. re-evaluation of initial decision mandated. (Para 4)

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 03.10.2017 in O.P.(Ele) No. 214 of 2008 passed by the Court of the Additional District Judge - II, Kollam.

2. The revision petitioner is the petitioner in the original petition. The original petition has been filed by the petitioner herein under Section s 10 and 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act , 1885 read with Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act , 1910, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., for the trees cut and removed from her property for the purpose of drawing a 400 kV electric line/ erecting tower from Madurai to Thiruvananthapuram.

3. The learned District Judge fixed the land value as Rs.15,000/- per cent. The percentage of diminution of the land value is fixed as 30%. The additional compensation granted was Rs.7,86,732/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of cutting of trees. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned District Judge erred in fixing the land value as Rs.15,000/- per cent. It is contended that though the petitioner had produced Ext.A5 sale deed in respect of identically situated land, the learned District Judge did not consider the same appropriately. It is further contended that as per the commission reports, the property is having public road access. However, without considering all these aspects, the learned District Judge fixed the land value as Rs.15,000/- per cent. It is contended that, due to the drawing of the electric line over the property, the petitioner is unable to carry out any agricultural activities or undertake any building construction on the property and the learned District Judge ought to have fixed a higher percentage of diminution in land value.

4. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides and after going through the impugned order, I am of the view that the matter requires reconsideration.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the original petition is remanded for fresh consideration and disposal on the basis of evidence already on record. The learned District Judge shall consider all relevant contentions raised by both parties and dispose of the original petition in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the Additional District Court - II, Kollam, on 05.01.2026. The learned District Judge shall endeavour to dispose of the matter within six months from the said date.

This Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top