Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHIRALI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PALAKKAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks legal remedies via writ petition for land status reassessment. (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. court requires independent assessment of land status. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. proper legal counsel for petitioner is noted. (Para 3) |
| 4. court emphasizes speaking orders in administrative decisions. (Para 4 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
" i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ order or direction and quash Ext.P9, Order No.RDOPKD/891/2024-J2 dated 23.05.2024 issued by 2nd Respondent.
ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction and direct the 2nd respondent to delete the petitioner’s property comprised in Re.Sy.Nos.53/19,21 in Block No.29 of Kavassery-I Village, Alathur Taluk in Palakkad District having an extent of 4.6849 Hectare from Ext.P4, Data Bank."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner’s property, though classified as ‘Nilam’, yet the same remained as “barren land” which is not suitable for any paddy cultivation, is the submission. The petitioner filed a Form-5 application, and the same was dismissed originally as per Ext.P7. The petitioner challenged the same before this Court, and the same was set aside by this C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
