Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
Baby B – Appellant
Versus
Sri.Anilkumar S – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition by street vendors regarding their rights. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by counsel for involved parties. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's observations on previous orders. (Para 5) |
| 4. clarification on ongoing related legal issues. (Para 6) |
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.
This Review Petition has been filed by persons who were not p arties to Devaswom Board Petition No. 49 of 2025.
2. The application for leave filed as I.A.No.1 of 2025 was heard and allowed.
3. The review petitioners state that they are street vendors and that their rights to vend, as protected under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act , 2014, have been violated. They contend that they have already applied for a street-vending licence in terms of the 2014 Act and the Kerala Street V endors Scheme, 2019, and have instituted W.P.(C) No. 43641 of 2025 before this Court. It is submitted that in the said writ petition, the learned Single Judge has granted a n order of status quo, and that the Writ Petition is still pending consideration. However, according to them, misinterpreting certain observations made by this Court in DBP No. 49 of 2025, t he review peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
