SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57480

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
NIDHI COMPANIES ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45558 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SABU GEORGE, SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN, SRI.MANU VYASAN PETER
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.R.AJITH KUMAR

The court mandates timely administrative action on representations while ensuring opportunity for the petitioner to be heard, emphasizing procedural fairness and expediency.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks a direction for the timely consideration of representations submitted to the 1st respondent (Union of India), concerning association matters. The court finds the 1st respondent must address the representations expeditiously, ideally within three months, accommodating the petitioner's hearing rights. The outcome mandates responsiveness from the administrative authority while preserving procedural fairness.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests timely consideration of representations. (Para 1)
2. court acknowledges pending actions by the respondents. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 10th day of December, 2025 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 representations after hearing the representatives of the petitioner association within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.

2. Heard the learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondent who upon instructions submitted that Exts.P3 and P4 representations are received and pending, and that appropriate decision on the same will be taken without any delay.

Taking into consideration above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 representations submitted by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, and after affording an opportunity of being heard to the representatives of the petitioner association.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top