Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
SMT. T.S. SHARADHA – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claims on property settlement. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent's defenses against the petition. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court examines grounds for petition. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. no implied condition in settlement deed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers :-
(i) issue appropriate writ in the form of certiorari or any other appropriate writ of direction to set aside Ext.P7
(ii) issue appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent to account the income in the form of monthly rent obtained to him from leasing out the building comprised in the deed of settlement No.20/11/2010 dated 15.01.2010 of Ernakulam SRO executed by the petitioner in favour of the 3rd respondent.
(iii) issue appropriate writ order or direction to declare Ext.P1 the deed of settlement No.201/II/2010 dated 15.01.2010 executed by the petitioner favour the 3rd respondent, covered by Ext.P2 petition to be null and void.
2. The petitioner is a widow and senior citizen aged 84 years. The petitioner herein filed a complaint under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of the parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
