Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN, JJ
REVATHY K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detention under kaa(p) act justified based on detenu's criminal record. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court observations on the justification and reasoning for detention. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding the sufficiency of bail conditions and necessity of detention. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. details of detenu’s criminal history and bail conditions. (Para 7 , 8) |
J U D G M E N T
Jobin Sebastian, J.
This writ petition is directed against an order of detention dated 03.08.2025, passed against one Rahul S/o. Ramakrishnan, the detenu, under Section 3 (1) of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007 (‘KAA(P) Act’ for brevity). The petitioner herein is the mother of the detenu.
2. The records reveal that on 09.07.2025, a proposal was submitted by the District Police Chief, Malappuram, seeking initiation of proceedings against the detenu under the KAA(P) Act before the jurisdictional authority, the 2nd respondent. For the purpose of initiating the said proceedings, the detenu was classified as a "known rowdy" as defined under Section 2 (p)(iii) of the KAA(P) Act.
3. Altogether, eleven cases in which the detenu got involved have been considered by the jurisdictional author
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
