Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SOUMINI.G – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER OF SREE NARAYANA TEACHERS' TRAINING INSTITUTE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and background of appeals concerning teacher's reinstatement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural history of the appeals and prior judgments on reinstatement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding the reinstatement and validity of orders. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's commentary on governmental responsibilities versus the school's managerial roles. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's ruling emphasizing the need for reinstatement according to legal precedents. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna S., J.
The 5th respondent in W.P.(C)No.18201 of 2022 filed W.A.No.2380 of 2025 and the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.12745 of 2021 filed W.A.No.2381 of 2025, under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , challenging the common judgment dated 18.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in those writ petitions. Since the issue involved in these writ appeals is the same, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For convenience of reference, the parties and documents in these writ appeals are referred to as in W.A.No.2381 of 2025 and in the corresponding writ petition, unless otherwise stated.
2. The facts which le
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
