IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ABHISHEK GEORGE MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to travel. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-
“A. Declare that it is the fundamental right of the Petitioner to travel abroad and that the Respondents are not entitled to restrict the same, except strictly in accordance with any provision of law;
B. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records of the proceedings from the Respondents, leading to the stamping of CWOP on the Petitioner’s Passport as evidenced in Ext.P14 and quash the same; C. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records of the proceedings from the Fourth and Fifth Respondents, leading to the issuance of the Look Out Circular against the Petitioner, and quash the same;
D. Issue a writ in the nature of prohibition or any appropriate writ, order or direction, prohibiting Respondents from imposing any travel restrictions upon the Petitioner to go abroad India except in accordance with the law;
E. Issue such other appropriate relief or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of this case; and F. Pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.