IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
SUBAIR C. K – Appellant
Versus
1 RIFANA C.H – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and initial orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding appeal and delay. (Para 3 , 4) |
R.P.(FC).No.46 of 2025 3 COMMON ORDER in Crl.M.A.No.2 of 2025 in R.P.(FC).No.46 of 2025 &
R.P.(FC).No.46 of 2025 Dated this the 16th day of December, 2025 This revision has been filed challenging the order in M.C.No.64/2019 on the files of the Family Court, Kasaragod, whereby the learned Family Court Judge granted reliefs as under:
“In the result, MC is allowed as follows:-
1) Respondent is directed to pay ₹10,000/-, ₹7,000/-, ₹6,000/- and ₹4,000/- respectively as monthly maintenance allowance to petitioners 1 to 4 from 05/2019.
2) He shall deposit half of the arrears of maintenance allowance from 05/2019, till the date of this order, within six months from the date of this order.
3) PW1 is also entitled to receive ₹5,000/- as litigation expenses from respondent.
4) In case respondent fails to comply with the above conditions, PW1 is authorized to recover the amount, from the respondent and his assets, by due process of law.
&
R.P.(FC).No.46 of 2025 4
5) Respondent or any other persons acting under him are restrained by an order of prohibitory injunction from forceful
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.