IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SHABEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of petition under section 482 cr.pc for quashing (Para 1) |
| 2. opposition to petition by public prosecutor (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observation on identity disclosure (Para 3) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 16th day of December, 2025)
The 5th accused in Crime No. 2430 of 2020 of Kodungallur Police Station filed this petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section 228-A (1) of IPC , on the ground that he has disclosed the identity of the victim in a PoCSO case in the social media. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, in the allegations levelled against the petitioner as well as from the documents produced by the police along with the final report, there is nothing to prove that, by the conduct of the petitioner, the identity of the victim in the PoCSO case was made known to others. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
2. The petition was opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor. From the final report as well as from the screen short produced along with the final report it is revealed that the petitioner has posed onl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.