Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SATHISH NINAN, MR. P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
ARUN A.A. – Appellant
Versus
SHIMNA O.H. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims recovery of ornaments and maintenance. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents deny claims; assert false allegations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. evaluated oral and documentary evidence in family court. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. petitioner's claims supported by documentation presented in court. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court reaffirms entitlement to recover ornaments and maintenance. (Para 28 , 34) |
| 6. separation justifies divorce decree and maintenance order. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 7. final orders concerning divorce and recovery of ornaments. (Para 38) |
JUDGMENT
P.Krishna Kumar, J.
A common order passed by the Family Court, Thrissur is under challenge at the instance of the husband and his parents.
2. The wife filed O.P.No.240/2013 seeking recovery of 165 sovereigns of gold ornaments and ₹5,00,000/- from the husband and his parents. She also instituted M.C.No.151/2013 claiming maintenance for herself and the child. The husband, in turn, filed O.P.No.1310/2014 for divorce on the ground of cruelty. By the impugned common order, the Family Court allowed the petition filed by the wife and directed the husband and his parents to return 165 sovereigns of gold ornaments. The wife and the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
