Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Criminal Probe Can't Continue Against Unknowns Sans Prima Facie Offence: Bombay HC Quashes CBI FIR
06 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadikari Bids Empathetic Farewell to Kerala High Court
06 Mar 2026
Compensation U/S 28A LA Act Not Restricted to Foundational Award: Bombay High Court
06 Mar 2026
Karnataka HC Issues Notice on Sri Lankan Judge's Right to be Forgotten Plea for Removing Alleged Defamatory Online Content
06 Mar 2026
Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
06 Mar 2026
Shrivastava Highlights Bench-Bar Partnership in Farewell Speech
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Directs Urgent Monsoon Prep for Flood-Prone Kochi
06 Mar 2026
Ignoring Court-Mandated PWD Safety Report Invalidates Municipal Order: J&K&L High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
THE CHEMBRASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO. 9151 – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, by which Ext.P3 order of the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Malappuram, granting registration to the amendment of the bye-laws of the petitioner bank extending its area of operation to Pandikkad Village, Malappuram district, was set aside. It is submitted that Ext.P4 order was passed on the premise that the registration of the amendment to the bye-laws of the petitioner Bank would result in the petitioner bank being able to operate within the area of operation of the
4th respondent bank.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that Ext.P4 order cannot be sustained in law for more than one reason. It is submitted that, challenging Ext.P3, the 4thClick Here to Read the rest of this document
Registrar lacks authority to overturn Joint Registrar's decision during pending appeals under co-operative societies law.
The court affirmed the necessity of statutory compliance and established that mere apprehension does not justify intervention in administrative orders.
An appeal against the order of amalgamation of co-operative banks approved by the RBI is barred under Section 79 of the Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act.
The court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments allowing the Registrar to amalgamate cooperative banks without a resolution, affirming the State's legislative competence over cooperative s....
The Registrar's authority under S.80-A includes revising decisions without the constraint of pending proceedings, mandating adherence to procedural fairness.
The Registrar of Cooperative Societies has supervisory authority under Section 66 to intervene in the appointment process of officers within cooperative societies.
The High Court confirmed the necessity for adherence to prior judgments related to asset transfer in cooperative societies and clarified conditions under which government orders could be remitted for....
The court reinforced the necessity to adjudicate disputes under Section 69 of the Co-operative Societies Act, mandating merits consideration upon proper fee payment.
Petitioner cannot challenge inquiry orders without completion of associated proceedings under the Act following established legal precedents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article