IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
SUJITH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CHITHRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. determination of claims regarding matrimonial property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. assessment of cruelty allegations in the context of marriage. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. recovery claims substantiated by available evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. judicial announcement of dissolution of marriage based on evidentiary insufficiency. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final order regarding the dissolution and conditions for recovery. (Para 16) |
P.Krishna Kumar, J.
By a common judgment, the Family Court, Chavara, partly allowed the petition filed by the wife seeking recovery of gold ornaments, patrimony, and declaration of title over the petition schedule property, while dismissing the husband’s petition for a decree of divorce. These appeals have been filed by both parties, each challenging the portion of the judgment adverse to their respective interests. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed in O.P. No.233/2013, the petition filed by the wife for recovery of money and gold. The marriage between the petitioner and the first respondent was solemnized on 12.09.2005. The petitioner alleges that, at the time of her marriage, she
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.