Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S.TH, JJ
P.Ganeshan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims title over property with eviction notices issued against him. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court mandates an inquiry into property title validation and compliance with permits. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. government contests the petitioner's claims based on ownership and compliance with property laws. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. writ petition disposed of with directive for inquiry on property title. (Para 8) |
| 5. the findings on ownership will guide the resolution of eviction notices. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioner, who is a resident of Laksham Colony in KDH village of Munnar, filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Exts.P9, P10, P11 and P15 and quash the same so far as it is illegal and without considering the absolute right of the petitioner over his property;
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P13 and pass orders on it without delay;
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 7th respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
