Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
V.M MANOHARAN @ MANU MADHAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged with sexual offences leading to bail application. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues for bail based on duration of custody. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court observes the necessity of detention amid allegations. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.780/2025 of Ernakulam Town South Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Section 64 (1) and Section 64 (2)(f)
of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case is that the accused had on
08.09.2025, forced the victim to perform oral sex on him and also indulged in sexual intercourse with her and threatened her not to disclosed it to anyone, and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.10.2025 and hence he ought to be released on bail.
6. The petitioner claims to be a scriptwriter with whom the victim became acquainted and he sought her assistance for his work. Expl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
