IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
ANCY KANDISSERIL ALEX – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for medical termination of pregnancy. (Para 1) |
| 2. assessment requirements by medical board. (Para 4) |
| 3. legal framework governing termination of pregnancy. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. significance of medical opinions in court decisions. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final decision and directive for procedure. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners, who are husband and wife, have been seeking medical termination of 25 weeks' old pregnancy of the first petitioner, after having found the foetus is having a complex congenital heart disease. The petitioners are also parents of a child. Exts.P2 to P4 would indicate that there is substantial risk that, if the child is born, it would suffer from serious physical abnormalities The petitioners, therefore, seek for a direction to the respondents to permit the first petitioner to undergo medical termination of pregnancy.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Central Government Counsel and the learned Government Pleader. 3. When the writ petition came up for consideration on 12.12.2025, this Court directed the additional sixth respondent to constitute a Medical Board for the purpose of assessing the following:-
a) Whet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.