Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
P.V.Parameswaran – Appellant
Versus
Kottayam Grama Panchayath – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and encroachment issues regarding the property. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal procedures and notices related to encroachment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's assessment of facts and relevance to ongoing civil suit. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. jurisdictional limitations in addressing pending civil matters. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. result of the court's decision on the appeal. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
MURALEE KRISHNA S., J The petitioners in W.P.(C)No.34411 of 2022 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 08.10.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioners are in ownership and possession of property having an extent of 55 cents of Kottayam village in Kannur District. On the southern side of the property, there is an unused pathway. On 30.06.2022, when the petitioners came back from Bangalore after visiting their daughter, it was alarmingly noticed that the mud wall on the southern boundary of the property was destructed to a length about 70 meters encroaching upon the petitioners' property. On enquiry, it is learned that the encroachment is made at t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
