Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
VISHNU VENUGOPAL ARJUN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the crime and allegations against the petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's analysis and reasoning regarding bail application. (Para 4 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments concerning the petitioner's false involvement. (Para 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.858/2025 of Nedumkandam Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 296 (b), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 351(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. According to the prosecution, the accused had, on
05.08.2025, assaulted the defacto complainant and others after blocking the autorickshaw in which the defacto complainant was travelling and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely arrayed as an accused and that he has no involvement in the alleged crime.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that custodial interrogatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
