Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ARATHY ASOKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding mediation and the need for quashing. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's observation on mediation and proceedings. (Para 4) |
O R D E R Dated this the 17th day of December, 2025 Petitioner is the accused in CC. No.318/2024 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thripunithura arising out of Crime No.265/2024 of Udayamperoor Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 341 and 323 of IPC .
2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the entire dispute between the parties were settled as per Annexure-A5 compromise entered into between the parties before the Ernakulam Mediation Centre. Therefore, she prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submitted that a counter case against the 3rd respondent is pending and she seeks time for filing a Criminal Miscellaneous Case (Criminal) to quash the above case also.
4. Though Annexure A5 was passed as early as in October, 2024, so far the 3rd respondent has not filed any petition to quash the case as against her. Therefore, as argued by the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
