Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57776
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SIVASANKARAN – Appellant
Versus
SYAMALA – Respondent
RFA NO. 569 OF 2004
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
For the Respondents: SHRI.JAYKAR.K.S., SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN, SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH, SRI.RAHUL VARMA, SRI.V.S.ROBIN, SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
For the Respondents: SHRI.JAYKAR.K.S., SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN, SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH, SRI.RAHUL VARMA, SRI.V.S.ROBIN, SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR
An appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and represent their case.
Headnote:The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of representation from the appellant on multiple occasions. This decision was taken under the jurisdiction of the High Court, reflecting the procedural requirements for an appeal. The court has underscored the necessity for active participation in legal proceedings for the successful pursuit of claims.
JUDGMENT
Today, there is no representation for the appellant. There was no representation on 06.12.2025 and 16.12.2025. Therefore, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
