SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57776

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SIVASANKARAN – Appellant
Versus
SYAMALA – Respondent
RFA NO. 569 OF 2004



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
For the Respondents: SHRI.JAYKAR.K.S., SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN, SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH, SRI.RAHUL VARMA, SRI.V.S.ROBIN, SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR

An appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and represent their case.

Headnote:The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of representation from the appellant on multiple occasions. This decision was taken under the jurisdiction of the High Court, reflecting the procedural requirements for an appeal. The court has underscored the necessity for active participation in legal proceedings for the successful pursuit of claims.

JUDGMENT

Today, there is no representation for the appellant. There was no representation on 06.12.2025 and 16.12.2025. Therefore, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top