SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57799

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
NALINI JAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 832 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.14/2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.GODWIN JOSEPH, SHRI.ARUN BABU B., SHRI.VINOD.R
For the Respondents: SHRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER

The court has the authority to direct expeditious trial in cases with pending hearings based on witness and document evaluation.

Headnote:The petitioner, Nalini Jayakumar, filed an Original Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India requesting the Special Court to expedite the disposal of C.C. No. 4/2016. The Court noted the report from the Special Judge highlighting that 35-45 days would be required for witness examination, suggesting an 8-month timeline for resolution. Ultimately, the Court allowed the petition and directed the expedited handling of the case within eight months from the judgment date.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for expedited trial. (Para 1)
2. court hears arguments regarding case duration. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court observes trial time required. (Para 4)
4. final ruling to expedite case resolution. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 12th day of December, 2025 This Original Petition, has been filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner, who has been arrayed as the 1st accused in C.C. No.4/2016 on the of the Special Court (SPI/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram, seeking the following relief:

“I. Direct the Hon'ble Court of Special Judge (SPE/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram, to dispose off the C.C. No. 4/2016 on its file, expeditiously within a period of 3 months.

II. To permit the Petitioner to file the Original Petition (Criminal) without producing translation of vernacular documents marked as Exhibits in the Original Petition (Criminal).

III. Grant such other reliefs as may be prayed for and as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant and circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3. Since expeditious disposal of C.C. No.4/2016 on the files of the Special Court (SPI/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram, is the prayer canvased, a report from the learned Special Judge was called for.

4. As per the report dated 10.12.2025, the learned Special Judge enlisted the total number of cases pending and the number of witnesses and documents in the present case highlighting that, atleast 35 to 45 working days would be required to complete the examination of witnesses and accordingly 6-8 months time sought for to dispose of the case. The report also would show that there are 115 witnesses and 907 documents including cheques, passbooks, files etc. Thus, it appears that the trial would take time as submitted by the learned Special Judge.

5. In consideration of the facts involved, this petition stands allowed, directing the learned Special Judge (SPI/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram to hear and dispose of C.C. No.4/2016, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment as reported.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the Special Court, forthwith, for information and compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top