Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
VINU K.S – Appellant
Versus
VEENA VISWAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of expenses for marriage made under alleged deceit. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding deceit and validity of claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on credibility and nature of claims. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision emphasizing lack of merit in the appeal. (Para 10 , 12) |
Devan Ramachandran,J.
This appeal is impelled against the judgment of the learned Family Court, Muvattupuzha, in O.P.No.343/2020.
2. The appellant - who is the former husband of the
1st respondent - alleges that the latter and her parents had conducted their marriage "employing deceit" and that she had, subsequently left her matrimonial home on her own volition; thus, he being entitled to realize all the expenses incurred by him in connection with the marriage. He asserts that he spent Rs.7,81,000/- for the marriage and claims it under various heads - including the purchase of wedding saree and dresses for his former wife; purchase of “Thali Chain”; photography and videography; catering for the wedding feast etc.
3. The learned Family Court took the Original Petition to trial, along with two other matters; and after analyzing the evidence placed on record, dismissed it, holding th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
