SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57887

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RADHAMONY SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES(M&M)CORPN.LTD – Respondent
WP(C) 31266/2011



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2025 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 31266 OF 2011 PETITIONER:

RADHAMONY SHAJI,W/O.SHAJI, BRAHMIKALAM, AMICHAKARI.P.O,CHATHENKERY,PERINGARA,THIRUVALLA, (SECRETARY,AREA DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,WARD NO.XIV,, PERINGARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH).

BY ADVS.

SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SMT.V.AJITHA SRI.JOHN K.JOSEPH(SAJAN)

RESPONDENTS:

1 THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES(M&M)CORPN.LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,OFFICE OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA STATE BEVARAGES(M&M),CORPORATION LTD.,OFFICE OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

3 THE TRAVANCORE SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD (KERALA GOVERNMENT COMPANY),VALANJAVATTOM.P.O, THIRUVALLA -689014,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4 THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER,TRAVANCORE SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED(KERALA GOVERNMENT COMPANY),VALANJAVATTOM.P.O,THIRUVALLA-689104.

*ADDL USHA PERUMAL, SECRETARY, R5 KUDUMBASREE AREA DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, WARD NO.1, KADAPRA GRAMA PANCHAYATH.

*(ADLL R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 16-12-2011 IN IA

20018/11.)

*ADDL STATE OF KERALA R6 REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES (G)

DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

*(ADDL R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 16-12-2011 IN IA

20091/11.)

BY ADVS.

SRI.NAVEEN.T.

SHRI.BENNY P. THOMAS (SR.)

SHRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SHRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.P.G.JAYASHANKAR SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)

SRI.TONY AGUSTINE – GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

04.07.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

S.MANU JUDGE rp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top