IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
GOVINDANKUTTY. E.P – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 431 OF 2025 | SA NO.515 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek relief from adverse actions and reconsideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court allows time for petitioners to approach drat. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 19th day of December, 2025 The prayers in the OP(DRT) are as follows;
“(i) Call for the records relating to S.A. No. 515/2025 and the interlocutory applications disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal–I, Ernakulam;
(ii) Set aside Exhibits P5 order dated 10.12.2025 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal–I, Ernakulam;
(iii) Direct the Tribunal to reconsider the application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner afresh in accordance with law;
(iv) Grant an interim stay of all further SARFAESI proceedings pursuant to SA no. 515/2025 of DRT1 Ernakulam, pending disposal of this Original Petition;
(v) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice (vi) Petitioners may be exempted for the time being from filing the English translation of documents that are in vernacular language”.
2. If the petitioner has filed an application to get the certified copy of the impugned order the same shall be issued at the earliest.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that there are five secure assets, out of which the 7 cents of property in which the residential house is taken physical possession today. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to defer the taking of physical possession of other property for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to approach the DRAT.
The OP(DRT) is disposed of as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.