SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57943

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
ENRIC SHAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE AGALI SUB-REGISTRAR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47453 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH, SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI
For the Respondents: SRI. K. M. FAISAL, GP

Registration of property cannot be denied due to encumbrance, as per established legal principles.

Headnote:This judgment discusses the authority of the Sub-Registrar to deny registration based on the existing encumbrance. Referring to past judgments, the court established that registration cannot be refused solely due to an attachment. Relying on previous case law, the court ordered the registration of the sale deed within one month. The judgment aims to clarify procedural adherence in property transactions involving encumbrances.

Table of Content
1. petitioner presented sale deed for registration. (Para 1)
2. court asserts authority of the registrar concerning encumbrance. (Para 2)
3. past rulings confirm rights of transaction despite encumbrances. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 19th day of December 2025)

The petitioner has purchased 30 cents of property and had drafted a sale deed and presented before the respondent for registration. But the respondent did not register the same, on the ground that there is an attachment in the said property by the Sub court, Ottappalam in O.S. No.95 of 2012. Ext.P6 is the encumbrance certificate, which shows the attachment.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the respondent has no authority to deny the registration on the ground that there is an attachment. Ext.P7 is a judgment of this court in W.P.(C) No.13672 of 2015, which dealt with the same issue in respect of the property which was the subject matter of the same suit namely, O.S. No.95 of 2012 pending before the Sub Court, Ottappalam. This court directed that if the purchaser has agreed to purchase the property with the encumbrance, the Sub Registrar need not be detained from carrying out registration only on the ground of encumbrance existing. The encumbrance will run with the property and same will be subject to the decision of the civil court.

Fathima v. Canara Bank

3. This court in (2025 SCC online Ker. 3453) held that registration cannot be denied merely there is an attachment by a competent Civil or Family court and Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be invoked for an issuance of a writ of mandamus.

In view of the settled position of law and the Ext.P7 judgment, I direct the respondent to carry out the registration, if the sale deed is presented and the same is otherwise in order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above said direction.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top