IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED SINAN.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Appellants’ application for anticipatory bail was dismissed by the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Manjeri, by its order dated
27.11.2025. This appeal is in challenge of the said order.
2. Appellants are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.1164 of 2023 of Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram, registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 117(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ‘ BNS ’), apart from Section 3 (2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC/ST Act’).
3. According to the prosecution, when the defacto complainant, who is a member of a Scheduled Caste, demanded repayment of money borrowed by the first accused, in furtherance of their common intention, both the accused pushed the victim down from a scooter and assaulted him, resulting in a fracture to the right hand, and also abused him using his caste name, and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants, the learned counsel for the defacto complainant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions, submitted th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.