Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED SINAN.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of allegations leading to fir. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. exploration of relationship and financial dispute. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. analysis of whether sc/st allegations are valid. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditions of anticipatory bail granted. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Appellants’ application for anticipatory bail was dismissed by the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Manjeri, by its order dated
27.11.2025. This appeal is in challenge of the said order.
2. Appellants are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.1165 of 2023 of Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram, registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 324(2), 329(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ‘ BNS ’), apart from Section 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘ SC/ST Act ’).
3. According to the prosecution, on 11.10.2025, due to an enmity towards the defaco complainant, the accused had trespassed into her house and fisted on the chest of the defacto complainant’s son, and when the defacto complainant and her husband intervened, the second accused pushed them down and also beat the defacto
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
