SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57976

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
DHANYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 1321 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.258/2019



Important Points

Settlement of a criminal matter can allow for the quashing of proceedings against the petitioner.

Subject

Criminal Law - Revision Petition

Headnote

The judgment analyzed the settlement of a criminal case between the parties, indicating that both the petitioner and the defacto complainant submitted that the matter has been resolved. The court decided to dispose of the revision petition while allowing the petitioner to file an application for quashing. The court provided a direction to refrain from taking coercive actions against the petitioner for one month.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JAZIL DEV FERDINANTO
For the Respondents: SMT.KRIPA PRASAD, SR.PP-SRI.A.VIPIN NARAYAN

O R D E R

(Dated this the 19th day of December, 2025)

When this matter came up for arguments, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the defacto complainant/ Addl. 2nd respondent submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties.

In the above circumstances this Crl. revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application for quashing the case against the petitioner. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, now coercive steps are pending before the learned Sessions Judge, against the petitioner. In the above circumstance, there will be a direction not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner for a period of one month from today.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top