SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57977

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MARIYAMMA THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 937 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.SANTHOSH BABU
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER

A writ petition can be dismissed when the petitioner submits that it is not pressed, reflecting the court's authority in managing its docket.

Headnote:The court evaluates a writ petition where the petitioner, through counsel, represents that the case is not pressed and seeks dismissal. The judgment effectively acknowledges this stance, leading to a dismissal of the petition on those grounds. The court thereby dispenses with the petition on account of lack of pressing urgency.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this W.P.(C) is not pressed and hence it can be dismissed as not pressed.

In the light of the above submission, this W.P.(C) is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top