IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
ANITHA K.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT Dated this the 19th day of December, 2025 The petitioner states that she was the seniormost Teacher in Vimala Hridaya High School under the Neyyattinkara Educational District. Despite her qualification for promotion to the post of Headmistress, in the vacancy that had occurred in the School on and with effect from 01.06.2020, the 5th respondent-Manager gave charge to another person. Consequently, the petitioner filed W.P.(C)
No.40718/2022 before this Court.
2. By Ext.P1 judgment dated 25.01.2024, this Court found the action of the Manager illegal and consequently, it was declared that the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as Headmistress from 01.06.2020. This was challenged by the Manager in W.A. No.289/2024. However, the said Writ Appeal was dismissed and the 5th respondent promoted the petitioner as Headmistress as per Ext.P3 from
01.06.2020.
3. Though by Ext.P4 order, the 4th respondent found the petitioner eligible only for service and other benefits in the post of Headmistress from 04.03.2024, the 1st respondent, in Ext.P5 letter held that the petitioner is entitled to all the benefits in the post of Headmistress from
01.06.2020.
4. Accordingly, she was granted the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.