Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58050
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
SALEENA PHILIP – Appellant
Versus
ANEESA @ ANILA – Respondent
RFA NO. 611 OF 2016
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SURENDRAN, SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL
For the Respondents: SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY, SHRI.EBIN MATHEW, SHRI.A.JOSEPH GEORGE
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SURENDRAN, SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL
For the Respondents: SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY, SHRI.EBIN MATHEW, SHRI.A.JOSEPH GEORGE
The court acknowledged and enforced a mediated settlement, modifying the previous decree.
Headnote:In the case of RFA No. 611 of 2016, the court in its judgment noted the settlement of disputes reached by the parties through mediation. The court set aside the prior judgment and passed a modified decree in line with the settlement agreement, which forms part of the judgment. The final order included directives for the return of records, marking a resolution of the appeal.
Sathish Ninan, J.
The parties have settled their disputes in mediation. They have entered into a memorandum of agreement incorporating the terms of settlement. The impugned judgment is set aside and a modified decree is passed in terms of the settlement. The memorandum of agreement will form part of this judgment.
Records to be sent back.
