Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
PUSHPASREE – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition challenges land utilization decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. counter affidavit defends legality of previous orders. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. need for justified reasoning in rejecting land applications. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. judicial direction for timely reconsideration of applications. (Para 9) |
| 5. final judgment regarding applications and time frame for decision. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.R1(a), P25 and P28 orders and also for a consequential direction to take up the application submitted by the petitioner under Clause 6(2) of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order , 1967 [for short, ‘the KLU order’] and to grant permission to the petitioner to use her property for any other purpose, notwithstanding Ext.P25.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows: The petitioner is the absolute owner in possession of 60.70 Ares (150 cents) of land comprised in Survey Nos.143/1 and 143/2 of Guruvayur Village in Chavakkad Taluk, Thrissur District. The petitioner has purchased the said property by way of three sale deeds, which are produced as Exts.P1 to P3. After purchase, mutation was effected and ta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
