IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
EANTHAN NOUSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to conviction under ni act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. granting time for submission of fine (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R
This criminal revision petition has been filed challenging the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, 'the NI Act').
2. The petitioner is the accused. The 2nd respondent is the complainant. The 2nd respondent filed a private complaint against the petitioner under Section 142 of the NI Act as S.T.C.No.2783 of 2014 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Mananthavady (for short, 'the trial court'). After trial, the trial court found the petitioner guilty under Section 138 of the NI Act and he was convicted for the said offence. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a fine of Rs.9,03,575/- to the complainant under Section 357(1)(b) of Cr.P.C., in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months. The petitioner challenged the conviction and sentence of the trial court before the Additional Sessions Court, Mananthavady (for short, 'the appellate court') in Crl.Appeal No.102 of 2024. The appellate court co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.