SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
BHARATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41527 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE, SMT.A.A.GEETHA
For the Respondents: SMT.VIDHYA A.C., GP

The court emphasized the necessity for the responsible authority to act on registry transfers within a specified time frame.

Headnote:The writ petition sought the transfer of registry based on a joint Will. The Tahsildar was identified as the responsible party for the transfer, and was impleaded as an additional respondent. The court mandated that the Tahsildar consider the application in accordance with the law established in R.Babu v. State of Kerala, within two months. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Table of Content
1. transfer of registry based on joint will. (Para 1)
2. tahsildar's role in the registry transfer process. (Para 2 , 3)
3. timely compliance with the court's orders is mandated. (Para 4)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 41527 OF 2025 PETITIONER:

BHARATHI AGED 76 YEARS W/O. LATE RAJAN, MANTHRAKKAL HOUSE, THIRUVANIYOOR KARA, THIRUVANIYOOR P.O.THIRUVANIYOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682308 BY ADVS.

SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE SMT.A.A.GEETHA RESPONDENTS:

1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686669

2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER THIRUVANIYOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANIYOOR P.O.KUNNATHUNAD TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682308 SMT.VIDHYA A.C., GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT The petitioner claimed transfer of registry on the strength of a joint Will. However, the same has not been done, is the short grievance of the petitioner.

2. This Court notice that the transfer of registry has to be done by the Tahsildar concerned, who is not a party herein.

3. In the circumstances, ‘Tahsildar, Kunnathunadu Taluk Office (Perumbavoor), Mini Civil Station, Pooppani Road, Perumpavoor-683542’ is suo motu impleaded as the additional 3rd respondent, for whom the learned Government Pleader takes notice.

4. There will be a direction to the additionally impleaded 3rd respondent to consider petitioner’s application for transfer of registry based on Ext.P2/Will in the light of law laid down by this Court in R.Babu v. State of Kerala [ 2024 KHC 7141 ], expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the additional 3rd respondent for compliance. This Writ Petition will stand disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top