SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD – Appellant
Versus
VEERAMUTHU DURAISAMY – Respondent
MACA NO. 3424 OF 2022 | OPMV NO.373 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD, SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.N.SANTHOSH, SHRI.JOSHY THANNICKAMATTAM

An appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act can be dismissed if the appellant withdraws their claim.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The present appeal arises under the Motor Vehicles Act concerning compensation claims. Facts of the Case: The appellant initiated a claim appeal, but submitted a withdrawal memo for dismissal.

Findings of Court:
The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.

Issues: Whether the appeal should proceed given the withdrawal request.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that without the appellant's desire to continue, the appeal could not proceed.

Result: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 18th day of December, 2025 When the matter was taken up for consideration today, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that a withdrawal memo had been filed.

In view of the withdrawal memo dated 24.11.2025 filed by learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top