Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58196
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD – Appellant
Versus
VEERAMUTHU DURAISAMY – Respondent
MACA NO. 3424 OF 2022 | OPMV NO.373 OF 2018
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD, SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.N.SANTHOSH, SHRI.JOSHY THANNICKAMATTAM
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD, SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.N.SANTHOSH, SHRI.JOSHY THANNICKAMATTAM
An appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act can be dismissed if the appellant withdraws their claim.
Headnote:Statute Analysis: The present appeal arises under the Motor Vehicles Act concerning compensation claims. Facts of the Case: The appellant initiated a claim appeal, but submitted a withdrawal memo for dismissal.
Findings of Court:
The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.
Issues: Whether the appeal should proceed given the withdrawal request.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that without the appellant's desire to continue, the appeal could not proceed.
Result: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 18th day of December, 2025 When the matter was taken up for consideration today, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that a withdrawal memo had been filed.
In view of the withdrawal memo dated 24.11.2025 filed by learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
