IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
B.HALSHT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court mandated expeditious handling of tribunal applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. recognition of unduly delayed proceedings impacting promotions. (Para 3 , 4) |
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikar i, J.
The present original petition under Article 227 has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the original application No.587 of 2022 pending before it, as expeditiously as possible, within a time frame.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the original application is pending since in the year 2022 and pleadings are also complete. However, the respondents, on one or the other pretext, are seeking adjournment and are not willing to argue the matter finally.
3. In the order dated 18.11.2025, the Tribunal had come to the conclusion that there is no impediment to hear the matter finally and had posted the matter for disposal on 17.12.2025. On 17.12.2025, the matter was again adjourned to 12.01.2026 on the behest of both the parties.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that because of the pendency of the original application, his case for promotion is not being considered and he belongs to ST Comm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.