Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M.TH, JJ
THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
P.R. AJI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims violations of rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. disciplinary actions against mentally ill employee. (Para 4) |
| 3. protection under rpwd act confirmed for respondent. (Para 5) |
| 4. appellants contest reinstatement and supernumerary post. (Para 6) |
| 5. benefits under rpwd act require minimum disability threshold. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. court examines certificate validity under rpwd. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. judgment overturn due to lower court's oversight. (Para 13) |
| 8. appellants allowed to proceed with disciplinary action. (Para 14 , 15) |
Judgment
[W.A.No.756 of 2024]
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra court appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 assails the judgment dated 25th March 2024 passed in WPC No.6443 of 2023 whereby the Writ Petition filed by the respondent has been allowed. Respondents 1 to 3 in the Writ Petition are the appellants in this Writ Appeal whereas the re-spondent herein was the petitioner in the Writ Petition.
2. The respondent had filed the Writ Petition claiming for the following reliefs:
i) To declare that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner and the tentative opinion formed to im- p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
