Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MYMOONATH – Appellant
Versus
PRATHAPAN S.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petitions filed challenging contempt proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authority for land disputes identified. (Para 3) |
| 3. no grounds for reviewing prior judgments. (Para 4) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1947 RP NO. 1681 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 31.10.2025 IN Con.Case(C)
NO.2361 OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: 1 MYMOONATH, AGED 78 YEARS, W/O. MOHAMMED ABDULLA, JAWAD NIVAS, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695013
2 JAWAD M, AGED 61 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED ABDULLA, JAWAD NIVAS, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695013
3 RASILATH, AGED 66 YEARS D/O. FATHIMA BEEVI, RAMEES MANZIL, PAYIKUZHI, OACHIRA P. O., KOLLAM, PIN - 690526
4 SEENATH, AGED 64 YEARS D/O. FATHIMA BEEVI, KANDANKERI THEKKATHIL, ARATTUPUZHA NORTH, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690515
5 MUBEENA, AGED 60 YEARS D/O. FATHIMA BEEVI, NADALAKAL HOUSE, PERINGALA P. O., KAYAMKULAM, PIN – 690559
6 TAJUNNISSA, AGED 59 YEARS W/O. ABDUL HAMEED, MUNDUKARIYIL KURAKODE, THONAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695317
7 MUBARAK, AGED 57 YEARS S/O. FATHIMA BEEVI, H
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
