Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
NABISSA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
TAJUDEENKUNJU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. litigation background surrounding vehicle sale and damages. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the existence of disclosed documents at the time of sale. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. plaintiff’s responsibility in the registration transfer process. (Para 8) |
| 4. final ruling based on evidence presented in court. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2001 in O.S.No. 16/1997 on the files of the Sub Court, Attingal.
2. The suit was filed for realisation of damages.
After the decree was passed, the plaintiff died on 02.04.2002, and the appeal is preferred by the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff purchased a 1990 model mini lorry bearing Registration No. KL-01 9210 for a consideration of Rs.1,76,000/- from the defendant. An amount of Rs 15,000/- was paid on 24.08.1994 and the balance amount was paid on 01.09.1994. At the time of the transaction, the defendant delivered the permit, RC book, and other documents relating to the vehicle to the plaintiff. The defendant informed the plaintiff that he purchased the vehicle from one Prasanna and agreed to transfer the permit in the name of plaintiff within six months.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
