Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
HARRISONS MALAYALAM LTD – Appellant
Versus
P.V.RAVEENDRAN(DIED)(LRS IMPLEADED) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the licensing agreement and construction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. nature of the trial court's findings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's analysis of relevant evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. interpretation of section 60(b) of the easements act. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court's conclusion regarding the findings of the lower court. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. final judgment and reversal of prior rulings. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
EASWARAN S., J --------------------------------
R.S.A No.1076 of 2011 -------------------------------
Dated this the 27th day of November, 2025
J U D G M E N T
The appellant company aggrieved by the judgment and decree in A.S No.7/2010 on the files of Sub Court, Kattappana, which reversed the dismissal of the suit by the Munsiff’s Court, Peermade, in O.S No.188/2008 has come up in this appeal.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:-
The 1st appellant-company granted a licence in favour of the plaintiffs over 18.88 Hectares of land in Survey No.91, 61/2 and 61/3 of Periyar Village in Peermade Taluk, for cardamon plantation, known as Wallardie Estate. The peri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
