SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58702

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI TH, J
ABHIJITH B. – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GIGIMON ISSAC
For the Respondents: SRI.T.A.PRAKASH

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 18th day of November 2025)

The petitioner is a legal heir of the late Mr. Babu (the fifth respondent), who served as a guarantor for a loan obtained by the second respondent firm from the first respondent bank. Following a default in repayment, the bank initiated recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act against respondent Nos.2 to 6. The property currently secured under these proceedings was inherited by the petitioner following the demise of Mr. Babu on August 6, 2025.

2. The petitioner submits that the first respondent bank continued proceedings under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act (M.C. No. 689/2025) despite having knowledge of the fifth respondent’s demise. Pursuant to these proceedings, the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the CJM, Kollam, issued a possession notice (Ext.P1) dated 30.08.2025, scheduling the takeover of the property on 13.09.2025. Although, the Advocate Commissioner was formally requested via Ext.P2 on 10.09.2025 to report the death of the fifth respondent to the Court, no action was taken. Subsequently, the 3rd respondent moved the CJM, Kollam, through CMP No. 7692/2025 (Ext.P3), seeking to stay the proceedings and restrain the C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top