IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
BINU SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
V.VIJAYAKUMAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[WA Nos.2023/2024, 478/2025, 482/2025, 2024/2024]
Devan Ramachandran , J.
Within the labyrinthine pleadings and fasciculous of statutes involved in these cases, rises a short question, whether the “Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam” (for short 'the Yogam') is a company operating under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and consequently, under the Companies Act, 2013 ; or under the provisions of the Kerala Non-Trading Companies Act, 1961 (for short “the Kerala NTC Act”).
2. We propose to be circumspect and brief in our observations and holdings in these appeals; the reason for it to become manifest presently, as we deal with the matter.
3. There are four appeals before us — all impelled against the judgments of a learned Single Judge of this Court, which decided two writ petitions jointly, namely, WP(C) Nos.8382/2020 and 1385/2021.
4. The afore two writ petitions were filed by the members of 'the Yogam', challenging the validity of the order of the Government of India dated 20.08.1974 (for short 'the impugned order'); while, in one of them, the petitioners also assail Article 44 of the Articles of Association of 'the Yogam'.
5. The projected cause for the writ petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.