SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI U JAYAKRISHNAN PP

Table of Content
1. accusations against the petitioner relate to possession of liquor. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. the court assesses the need for continued detention. (Para 5)

ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (“ BNSS ” for short).

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.169/2025 of Excise Range Office, Mannarkkad, Palakkad. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 55(i) and 13 r/w 63 of the Abkari Act .

3. Prosecution allegation is that on 20.12.2025, at 2 p.m., the accused was found in possession of 10 litres of Indian made foreign liquor for the purpose of sale in violation of provisions of the Abkari Act and thereby committed the aforementioned offences. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and pursued the records.

5. The allegation that the petitioner possessed 10 liitres of Indian made foreign liquor for sale, in contravention of the Abkari Act cannot be viewed lightly. A perusal of the records reveals that the accusation against the petitioner is prima facie well-founded. Anyhow, the petitioner was caught re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top