SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. JAYAKUMAR, J
VISHNU R S – Appellant
Versus
NIT KOZHIKODE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 48492 OF 2025



Important Points

Permission to withdraw a writ petition allows for the filing of a fresh petition, ensuring the right to seek judicial remedies is preserved.

Subject

Civil Law - Writ Petition

Headnote

This judgment involves an analysis of the permissions accorded in writ petitions. The petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty for a fresh one, which the court duly permits. The court determined that as the request is permissible, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.I.RAHUL, SMT.SHIFA LATHEEF
For the Respondents: SRI. SHYAM PADMAN

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Permission is granted.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top