SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. JAYAKUMAR, J
VISHNU R S – Appellant
Versus
NIT KOZHIKODE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 48492 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.I.RAHUL, SMT.SHIFA LATHEEF
For the Respondents: SRI. SHYAM PADMAN

Permission to withdraw a writ petition allows for the filing of a fresh petition, ensuring the right to seek judicial remedies is preserved.

Headnote:This judgment involves an analysis of the permissions accorded in writ petitions. The petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty for a fresh one, which the court duly permits. The court determined that as the request is permissible, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Permission is granted.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top