Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
M/S. PDMC INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background about writ appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments related to actions and procedures of the bank (Para 5 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural compliance by the bank (Para 6 , 7 , 14) |
| 4. concluding remarks on maintainability and procedures (Para 8 , 12 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners in W.P.(C)No.5466 of 2025 have filed this writ appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , challenging the judgment dated 06.08.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, to the extent that the reliefs with respect to the 3rd appellants-3rd petitioners KCC Loan Account were not granted by the learned Single Judge.
2. The appellants-petitioners have filed W.P.(C)No.5466 of 2025, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs;
“i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Exts.P8, P8(a) and P8 (b) whereby the loan facility was recalled;
ii) Issue a writ declaring further that the classification of the loan accounts of the petitioners as NPA by resorting to circuitous methods contrary to the provisio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
