Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
GOPAKUMAR G – Appellant
Versus
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THE KERALA MARITIME BOARD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46626 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.B.PRADEEP, SMT.KSHEMA ELIZABETH SAMUEL, SMT.ANEETA NIRMAL MAMEN, SHRI.P.ROHIT NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU, GP., SRI. K.P. SUDHEER, SC.

A writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner seeks such permission from the court.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition No. 46626 of 2025. The court noted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The ruling underscores the discretion of the courts to allow withdrawal of petitions at any stage. The final outcome of the judgment is that the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 58863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMV.G.ARUN, JGOPAKUMAR G – AppellantVersusTHE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THE KERALA MARITIME BOARD – RespondentWP(C) NO. 46626 OF 2025

A writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner seeks such permission from the court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
GOPAKUMAR G – Appellant
Versus
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THE KERALA MARITIME BOARD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46626 OF 2025