Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DR. FRANCIS NADAKKAVUKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks intervention under supervisory jurisdiction. (Para 1) |
| 2. tribunal dismisses based on lack of required qualifications. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by both sides. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. clarification on article 227's application limits. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling confirms no grounds for interference. (Para 12) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The applicant in O.A.(EKM)No.715 of 2024 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench, Ernakulam, has filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , seeking an order to set aside Ext.P4 order dated 12.08.2024 of the Tribunal in that original application, which was one filed by the petitioner- applicant, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, seeking an order to set aside Annexure A7 notification dated 21.05.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent Kerala Public Service Commission, publishing the short list containing the register numbers of candidates who are found provisionally eligible to be call for interview, subject to the verification of original documents, fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
