Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DR. SAJU K.G – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the high court found the dismissal of the original petition appropriate and upheld the tribunal’s decision. (Para 1) |
| 2. the petitioner challenges the tribunal’s dismissal based on preferential rights due to impending retirement. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. the tribunal validated the transfer of the 5th respondent considering compassionate grounds. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.(EKM) No.180 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam (the ‘Tribunal’ in short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the order dated 21.07.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. Going by the averments in the original application, the petitioner is presently working as a Consultant ENT at General Hospital Thrissur. The petitioner is getting superannuation on 31.05.2026 and has less than 2 years of service. Further, the petitioner belongs to the scheduled caste category. The petitioner's wife is working in Thrissur District, and their only daughter is studying in Ernakulam District. The petitioner is having
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
