US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
TRANSPORT PENSIONERS FRIEND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pension revision disparities challenge (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. legal obligations of pension without discretion (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. discriminatory classifications under scrutiny (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial perspective on government policies (Para 13) |
| 5. court orders quashing prior directives (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
2. In W.P.(C) No. 18688 of 2023, the petitioners have challenged Exhibit P5 order dated 16.5.2023, issued by the 1st respondent, rejecting the petitioners’ request for revision of pens
Pension revisions cannot be denied based on financial constraints or arbitrary classifications based on retirement dates, ensuring equal treatment for all pensioners.
Pension entitlement is governed by existing rules, and any revisions depend on state policy, not individual claims based on service length.
Hon'ble Supreme Court held beyond shadow of any doubt that financial implication is a relevant criterion for State Government to determine as to what benefits can be granted pursuant to recommendatio....
Pension is a legal entitlement governed by rules, not at the discretion of the authorities, ensuring that pre-2008 retirees are also entitled to revised pension benefits.
Fixing of a cut-off date for granting of benefits is well within the powers of Government as long as the reasons therefor are not arbitrary and are based on some rational consideration.
Pension for UGC scale teachers must be calculated based on revised pay from the date of retirement, not delayed by government policy.
Deokinandan Prasad v. State of Bihar & Ors.
-
Read summaryAll Manipur Pensioners Assn. v. State of Manipur
-
Read summaryMaharashtra State Financial Corpn. Ex-Employees Assn. v. State of Maharashtra
-
Read summaryChairman & MD, KSRTC v. K.O. Varghese
-
Read summaryState of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajesh Chander Sood
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.