Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. T.R.RAVI, J
SYAM S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayers in writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the petitioner’s employment and charges. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court’s analysis of legal precedents and standards. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. finding of the enquiry officer lacks evidence. (Para 11) |
| 6. final decision of the court allowing reinstatement. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in the writ petition are as follows.
“i) Call for records leading to Exts. P20 and P21 and
ii) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order setting aside Ext.P7 charge memo, P16 enquiry report, P17 termination notice, P20 order of dismissal issued by the 3rd respondent and Ext.P21 Minutes of the 4th respondent.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service forthwith with back wages from the date on which the petitioner was dismissed from service till the date of reinstatement.
iv) Petitioner also pray that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the vernacular language.
v) Award costs of the proceedings to the peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
