IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. T.R.RAVI, J
SYAM S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The prayers in the writ petition are as follows.
“i) Call for records leading to Exts. P20 and P21 and
ii) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order setting aside Ext.P7 charge memo, P16 enquiry report, P17 termination notice, P20 order of dismissal issued by the 3rd respondent and Ext.P21 Minutes of the 4th respondent.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service forthwith with back wages from the date on which the petitioner was dismissed from service till the date of reinstatement.
iv) Petitioner also pray that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the vernacular language.
v) Award costs of the proceedings to the petitioner
vi) Any other relief this Hon’ble Court deems fit.”
2. According to the petitioner, he entered the service of the 2nd respondent as a Peon-cum-Driver in the year 2005, under the dying in harness scheme. He was transferred and posted to the Division Engineer’s Office, Thiruvananthapuram, as per Ext. P1 order dated 29.5.2020. By Exhibit P2, he was promoted to the post of Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.